• Home
  • Feedback/Grades
  • New Mountains
  • Reflections
  • Assignments
  • Term Papers

Sisyphean High

One must imagine Sisyphus happy.

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« [MS] Feedback: Ad Campaigns
[MS] Tom Junod, “The Falling Man” »

[MS] Reading Photography 101

April 18, 2010 by Mr. Eure

Susan Sontag, ON PHOTOGRAPHY

To read a photography, we need a philosophy; without one, we are passive consumers of visual data, reflecting little and evaluating only in the most basic terms (the “that’s cool” and “that sucks” school).  In this course, we use Susan Sontag’s On Photography, focusing on an excerpt that covers (among many splendid ideas) four key concepts: the grammar of seeing, the ethics of seeing, the role of the photographer, and the inherent didacticism of photography.

After having collaborated in class on an annotation (of sorts) of the excerpt, you are all capable of reading a photograph in a mature, thoughtful way.  The list here is a guideline, not a requirement; while you can separate each section, effective analysis will meld them together in the obvious ways.

Reading a Photograph

  1. The Grammar of Seeing
  2. The Ethics of Seeing
  3. The Role of the Photographer
  4. The Photo’s Message

1.  Grammar

Sontag calls this “a new visual code” taught by photographs.  It is the study of the physical layout of the photograph, and it can be broken down into the following parts:

  • - the layout (what is where)
  • - the action (implied and explicit)
  • - the artistry (e.g., contrast, color, perspective, selectivity)
  • - our (read: the viewer’s) sense of what Sontag describes as ”what is worth looking at”

The last is a simple evaluation: Is this photograph worth looking at in an aesthetic sense?

2. Ethics

Sontag calls this the study of “what we have a right to observe”; she also compares it to the grammar of seeing, pairing the two as “imperatives of taste and conscience.”  This second step is about that conscience.  We, the viewers and readers of a photograph, must grapple with ideas of intrusiveness, morality, and violence (to name only three of a long list).

To use another framing question: Is the photograph under consideration worth considering in an ethical sense?  Note that not all photographs challenge us ethically — at least, not in the same ways.

3. The Photographer

Sontag argues that “aggression [is] implicit in every use of the camera,” painting the photographer as merely attempting to shine light on ”the shady commerce of art and truth.” We must place ourselves in the moment with the photographer, considering the context of that frozen artifact, the photograph itself.  Some of our considerations are here:

  • - Is the situation dangerous enough to threaten the photographer?
  • - Does the situation seem to suggest intervention, even if the photographer did not intervene?
  • - Is there a sense of the photographer’s style or personality in the photograph?
  • - Or does the photographer manage to be self-effacing, as Sontag calls it?

With these — and with the many other considerations possible — the framing question is this: What is revealed about the moment and the photographer by the evidence and implications of a human agent?

4. The Message

The most complicated aspect of reading a photograph is deciphering and separating the messages in it.  We look for context, both historical and contemporary (i.e., in our reading of the image); we look for impact, both historical and contemporary; and we look for didacticism – what the photograph teaches us.  Sontag argues that “photographs are as much an interpretation of the world as paintings and drawings are,” and our attempt is to understand fully that interpretation.  Although there are other ways to uncover meaning and insight from a photograph, the aforementioned keys are:

  • - historical and contemporary context
  • - historical and contemporary impact
  • - the instructive power of the photograph (its didacticism)

The framing question here: What does this photograph mean, and what does it do?

Advertisement

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Posted in Media Studies, Visual Imagery, [MS] Adversarials | Tagged didacticism, how-to guide, philosophy, photography, sontag | Leave a Comment

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 8 other followers

  • Classes

    • Language and Composition
      • Brother Ali
      • Reading Portfolios
      • [AP] Adversarials
      • [AP] Critical Prompts
      • [AP] Enrichment
      • [AP] General Commentary
      • [AP] Term Papers
      • [AP] Walking Deadlines
    • Media Studies
      • Advertising
      • Final Exam
      • Newspapers
      • Visual Imagery
      • [MS] Adversarials
      • [MS] General Commentary
    • Regents English 10
      • Final Exam
      • [RE] Adversarials
      • [RE] General Commentary
  • Glossolalia

    • Revisions and Reflections « Sisyphean High: AP English Language & Composition on [AP] Linguaphilia
    • A Note on Metacognition « Sisyphean High: Language and Composition on [AP] Linguaphilia
    • Madeleine Skaller on Proud Brainiacs
    • Ashley Henderson on Proud Brainiacs
    • Madeleine Skaller on Proud Brainiacs
    • Ashley Henderson on Proud Brainiacs
    • Ashley Henderson on Proud Brainiacs
    • Ashley Henderson on Proud Brainiacs
    • Ashley Henderson on Proud Brainiacs
    • Luke Useted on Proud Brainiacs
  • Ancillary Links

    • Apostrophe Abuse
    • Brian Dettmer's Website
    • Brother Ali
    • Fouroboros
    • Literally, a Web Log
    • Lost in Translation
    • The "Blog" of "Unnecessary" Quotation Marks
  • Pedagogical Links

    • Ads of the World
    • BHS: Bear Facts
    • Center for New Media and the Arts
    • Silva Rhetoricae
    • Teacher's Website
  • Flotsam and Jetsam

    ad campaigns ads of the world adversarial scores Advertising baudrillard brevity can't we all just get along cars close reading collegiality cuckoos DAMAGES didacticism dunce caps exemplary work favorite words and phrases Geoffrey Nunberg grades grammar Hazlitt language least favorite words and phrases lines in the sand linguaphilia logomisia meta-analysis michael jackson mtv my apologies to Maya Angelou fans negativity photography positivity print ads psychedelic images responsive writing self-fulfilling prophecies self-handicapping soap boxing squid ink term papers the invisible man the real kind of football timed writing underwear working well with others

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by Sadish.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Powered by WordPress.com